Which two interfaces are most commonly applied for NIV in the acute care setting?

In the context of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), the interfaces used are crucial for effective treatment, particularly in acute care settings. The most commonly applied interfaces are nasal masks and full face masks.

Nasal masks cover only the nose and are preferred for patients who are conscious, cooperative, and able to breathe comfortably through their nose. They are less bulky, provide a good seal, and can be more comfortable for patients who may not tolerate larger interfaces.

On the other hand, full face masks cover both the nose and mouth. These are selected for patients who may need to breathe through their mouths, especially if they are unable to fully cooperate or if their condition results in altered consciousness. Full face masks can also be beneficial for patients with a high level of respiratory distress or who require higher ventilation support, as they reduce the risk of air leaks.

The other options include interfaces that are not standard for NIV in acute care. Nasal cannulas and oral masks lack the capacity to deliver adequate positive pressure ventilation and are more suited for supplemental oxygen rather than NIV. Nasal pillows provide nasal support but may not be suitable for all patients, particularly those with higher ventilation needs. A tracheostomy mask is more suited for patients with a trache