In terms of cost, how does NPPV compare to invasive ventilation?

Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NPPV) is generally considered less expensive in comparison to invasive ventilation due to several factors. The costs associated with NPPV are lower primarily because it typically requires less intensive resources and involves fewer complications. Invasive ventilation, which often necessitates endotracheal intubation and prolonged ICU stays, incurs additional expenses related to sedation, monitoring, and the risk of complications such as ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Moreover, NPPV often allows for patients to remain mobile and have shorter hospital stays, further reducing costs. This approach can also decrease the need for extensive nursing support and resources that are often required with invasive techniques. Therefore, when evaluating the overall costs, NPPV presents a more economical option for managing respiratory distress than invasive ventilation.